Artivion (AORT) Q1 2026 Earnings TranscriptMay 7, 2026
Image source: The Motley Fool.
Date
May 7, 2026, 4:30 p.m. ET
Call participants
Chief Executive Officer — Pat Mackin Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer — Lance Berry
Full Conference Call Transcript
Unknown Speaker: Thank you. Good afternoon, and thank you for joining the call today. Joining me from Artivion, Inc.'s management team are Pat Mackin, CEO, and Lance Berry, COO and CFO. Before we begin, I would like to make the following statements to comply with the safe harbor requirements of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Comments made on this call that look forward in time involve risks and uncertainties and are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The forward-looking statements include statements made as to the company’s or management’s intentions, hopes, beliefs, expectations, or predictions of the future.
These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties, estimates, and assumptions that may cause results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements. Additional information concerning certain risks and uncertainties that may impact these forward-looking statements is contained from time to time in the company’s SEC filings and in the press release that was issued earlier today. You can also find a brief presentation with details highlighted on today’s call on the Investor Relations section of the Artivion, Inc. website. Lastly, please refer to our release published earlier today for information regarding our non-GAAP results, including a reconciliation of these results to our GAAP results. Unless otherwise stated, all comments today will be using our non-GAAP results.
Additionally, all percentage changes discussed will be on a year-over-year basis. Revenue growth rates will be at adjusted constant currency rates, and expenses as a percentage of sales will be based on adjusted revenues. With that, I will turn the call over to Pat Mackin.
Pat Mackin: Thanks, and good afternoon, everyone. Through 2026, we continued to execute our strategy designed to drive long-term profitable growth through an expanding and clinically differentiated product portfolio. In the quarter, we delivered constant currency revenue growth of 12% and adjusted EBITDA growth of 26% year over year. Revenue growth was driven primarily by On-X and stent grafts, including AMDS. We also benefited from growth within preservation services as tissue processing volumes normalized following the 2024 cybersecurity event. Before expanding further on product line performance, I would like to address today’s exciting news regarding the exercise of our option to acquire Endospan.
Story Continues
This follows the PMA approval of its NEXUS aortic arch stent graft system for chronic aortic dissections, which was achieved in early April. NEXUS is a branched endovascular stent graft system purpose-built for minimally invasive treatment of aortic arch disease, where patients often have no choice other than open-heart surgery. The clinical data are compelling. Data from the chronic aortic arch dissection cohort of the TRIUMPH trial demonstrated 93% survival from lesion-related death and 90% freedom from disabling stroke at one year post-treatment. Also, 95% were free from intervention due to endoleaks, excluding type II endoleaks, at one year in this very high-risk population.
As a reminder, the total annual U.S. addressable market opportunity associated with both cohorts is estimated to be around $150 million, with dissections representing about $100 million of that. We plan to pursue supplementing the label to include aortic aneurysms through formal regulatory processes expeditiously post acquisition. Importantly, our anticipated acquisition of Endospan and its NEXUS system will complete our market-leading three-pronged aortic arch portfolio. This technology, acquired alongside AMDS and our E-vita OPEN NEO with LSA branch (C-Branch LSA), will position us at the forefront of this segment as the only company globally with a complete portfolio of aortic arch solutions. Importantly, NEXUS is a platform technology, not just a single product.
It is supported by three additional PMA programs in development that we expect will further extend and solidify our leadership in the aortic arch market over time. We are pleased to have the financing already in place for this acquisition, and, subject to satisfactory and customary closing conditions, we expect to close in 2026. We expect to be ready for a full U.S. commercial launch of NEXUS in January 2027, following efforts to scale inventory production, complete value analysis committee processes, and augment our U.S. sales team. With that, let me turn back to our Q1 2026 results.
From a product category perspective, stent graft revenues grew 10% on a constant currency basis in the first quarter compared to the same period last year. Year-over-year constant currency growth fell below our expectations due to lower than expected AMDS starter set sales in the U.S., as well as softer than expected performance internationally, particularly in the Middle East. Year-over-year growth also reflects a tougher comp in Europe, following a strong Q1 2025 performance as we recovered from the 2024 cybersecurity event. While U.S. AMDS sales associated with initial stocking fell short of our expectations in Q1, we have been very encouraged by implant and reorder patterns within the accounts already using AMDS.
We view this as much more critical than the immediate impact of sales from starter sets. Strong reordering patterns reflect positive user experience and ultimately our long-term adoption and growth thesis. Looking ahead, we expect U.S. AMDS starter set sales to accelerate as more accounts get through the VAC process and finalize their procurement, and as we benefit from steps being taken to mitigate the initial upfront $100 thousand cost burden associated with stocking. We also anticipate PMA approval of AMDS in the coming months, which will obviate the need for entirely new accounts to go through the IRB process; some have deferred until PMA approval because of this increasingly imminent date.
Ultimately, we see our comprehensive stent graft portfolio as a foundational component of our growth strategy. We are encouraged by our enduring fundamental strength and increasingly strong competitive advantage within the segment. Looking ahead, we intend to replicate our proven strategy by bringing additional stent graft products that are already generating revenue in Europe to the U.S. and Japan, which we believe will unlock further meaningful expansion of our stent graft total addressable market. Meanwhile, our Q1 On-X revenue was up 17% year over year on a constant currency basis.
This growth was driven by further global market share gains and continued early traction in our new $100 million U.S. market opportunity unlocked by recently published data demonstrating improved outcomes with mechanical valves versus bioprosthetic valves for younger patients. We maintain our conviction that On-X is the best aortic valve in the market for patients under 65, and we will continue to take market share worldwide in that product line. Tissue processing revenues increased 23% year over year on a constant currency basis in the first quarter, as demand for our products remained strong and tissue volumes normalized year over year following the cybersecurity incident in late 2024.
Q1 results were slightly ahead of our expectations of roughly $24 million per quarter for that business. Lastly, BioGlue was relatively flat on a constant currency basis compared to the same period last year. While this performance was slightly lower than our mid-single-digit growth expectation contemplated in our previously communicated full-year revenue guidance, it falls within the range of normal quarter-to-quarter growth variability due to the significant amount of stocking distributor business in that product line. Lastly, on our pipeline, we continue to make great progress on the ARTISON clinical trial for our next-generation frozen elephant trunk.
We have 26 patients enrolled in the trial, which is a non-randomized clinical trial consisting of 132 patients in the U.S. and Europe at up to 30 centers for treatment of aortic dissection and aneurysm in the arch. We anticipate completing full enrollment in mid-2027. We are optimistic that the trial will be successful, supported by our clinical results from our current-generation frozen elephant trunk, E-vita OPEN NEO, which is available outside the U.S. Following the one-year follow-up period, assuming the trial meets its endpoints, we anticipate FDA approval for our C-Branch LSA in 2029, unlocking an incremental $80 million annual U.S. market opportunity.
In conclusion, while Q1 results fell short of our constant currency expectations and reflected some moving pieces that Lance will walk you through in detail, it was a quarter of meaningful progress against our long-term strategy. The fundamentals that underpin our growth strategy remain intact: a comprehensive, clinically differentiated portfolio, a focused commercial organization, and a pipeline that stands to expand our total addressable market continuously over time. The reordering behavior we are seeing within AMDS accounts reinforces our conviction in the long-term adoption story, and we have a clear line of sight to near-term drivers that will accelerate new account conversion.
On-X continues to take share from both mechanical and bioprosthetic valves and is the leading aortic valve on the market for patients under 65. With the addition of NEXUS, we now have what we believe is the most comprehensive aortic arch portfolio in the world, a position we have built deliberately and intend to extend. With that, I will now turn the call over to Lance.
Lance Berry: Thanks, Pat, and good afternoon, everyone. Before I begin, please refer to our press release published earlier today for information regarding our non-GAAP results, including a reconciliation of these results to our GAAP results. Additionally, all percentage changes discussed will be on a year-over-year basis, and revenue growth rates will be in constant currency unless otherwise noted. Total revenues were $116.3 million for Q1 2026, up 12% compared to Q1 2025. Adjusted EBITDA increased approximately 26%, from $17.5 million to $22.1 million in Q1 2026. Adjusted EBITDA margin was 19% in Q1 2026, an approximate 130 basis point improvement over the prior year, driven by leverage in SG&A and gross margin improvement.
From a product line perspective, stent graft revenues increased 10%, On-X grew 17%, tissue processing revenues grew 23%, and BioGlue revenues were relatively flat in Q1 2026. On a regional basis, revenues in Asia Pacific increased 6%, North America 23%, EMEA increased 5%, and Latin America decreased 23%, all compared to Q1 2025. International growth was below what we typically see from that part of the business. EMEA underperformance was driven by the stent graft-related factors that Pat discussed earlier, while underperformance across APAC and LatAm was driven primarily by quarterly fluctuations in distributor ordering patterns, which we expect to normalize over the course of the year.
Q1 gross margins were 64.9%, an increase from 64.2% in Q1 2025, primarily due to favorable product and geographic mix. General, administrative, and marketing expenses in the first quarter were $60.8 million compared to $54.7 million in Q1 2025. Non-GAAP general, administrative, and marketing expenses were $59.3 million, or 51% of sales in the first quarter, compared to $53.0 million, or 53.6% of sales, in Q1 2025, reflecting a 260 basis point improvement. Approximately 170 basis points were driven through leveraging existing infrastructure and annualizing our year-one AMDS launch costs, and approximately 90 basis points were from stock-based compensation.
Our as-reported expenses included a gain of approximately $1.5 million in Q1 associated with insurance reimbursement for cybersecurity costs incurred in previous periods, and approximately $1 million of diligence and integration planning costs associated with the planned acquisition of Endospan, both of which are excluded from adjusted EBITDA. R&D expenses for the first quarter were $8.8 million, or 7.6% of sales, compared to $6.7 million, or 6.8% of sales, in Q1 2025. Interest expense, net of interest income, was $5.2 million as compared to $7.5 million in the prior year. Other income and expense this quarter included foreign currency translation losses of approximately $800 thousand.
Free cash flow was negative $6.8 million in Q1 2026 as compared to negative $20.6 million in Q1 2025. As a reminder, the first quarter is typically our seasonally lowest free cash flow quarter, and although negative, this quarter’s free cash flow results were slightly better than anticipated. As of 03/31/2026, we had approximately $55.8 million in cash and $215.4 million in debt, net of $4.6 million of unamortized loan origination costs. At the end of the first quarter, our net leverage ratio was 1.8x, down from 4.0x in the prior year. Now for our outlook for 2026.
As Pat stated, our Q1 stent graft results did not meet our expectations, due to factors that could continue to impact our revenue in the near term, primarily softness in our international markets, particularly in the Middle East, and timing of AMDS starter set sales in the U.S. It is early in the year, and we are working to mitigate or offset these issues. However, given the uncertainty around the timing and impact of those actions, we believe it is prudent to adjust our guidance. We now expect adjusted constant currency growth between 7% and 11% for full year 2026, representing a reported revenue range of $480 million to $496 million.
This guidance contemplates FX to have an approximate one percentage point tailwind on as-reported revenue for the full year. From a product line perspective, the reduction relates primarily to stent grafts due to the factors we have discussed. This guidance assumes inconsequential revenue from U.S. NEXUS sales in 2026 as we seek value analysis committee approvals and build supply for an anticipated 01/01/2027 U.S. launch. As a reminder, growth in Q1 2026 was anticipated to be higher than the remaining quarters, driven by the easier comps for the preservation services business from the prior-year cybersecurity event.
These flip to difficult comps for the preservation services business in Q2 and Q3 before normalizing in Q4 2026, followed by a more consistent sequential improvement as our U.S. AMDS and U.S. On-X sales accelerate during the year and we return to normal costs for the preservation services business in Q4. Excluding the impact of the planned Endospan acquisition, we now expect full year 2026 adjusted EBITDA to be in the range of $100 million to $107 million, representing a range of 12% to 20% growth over 2025 and approximately 100 basis points of adjusted EBITDA margin expansion at the midpoint of our ranges.
Please note that this full-year adjusted EBITDA guidance excludes potential impact from the anticipated completion of the Endospan acquisition. Assuming the acquisition closes later in the quarter as anticipated, we would expect to incur approximately $8 million of incremental expense through 2026. This would include investments in launch costs and commercial infrastructure while also accounting for the absorption of Endospan operating costs, including ongoing R&D and clinical expenses. Given our expectation for immaterial revenue contribution from U.S. NEXUS sales in 2026, this incremental $8 million would be expected to reduce our full-year 2026 adjusted EBITDA to $92 million to $99 million.
Looking forward, we would expect the first meaningful revenue contribution to begin in January 2027, and we anticipate our combined results to be EBITDA neutral for full year 2027 as U.S. NEXUS revenue ramps over the course of the year and as we get combined R&D and clinical spending into our targeted range of 7% to 8% of sales. Relative to the pending acquisition, we also announced today that we drew $150 million under our existing term loan facility. The proceeds will be used to fund the $135 million upfront purchase price for the anticipated Endospan acquisition.
Assuming the acquisition closes as anticipated, quarterly interest expense would increase to approximately $8 million starting in Q3 2026, with Q2 2026 interest expense expected to be slightly lower than that. As a reminder, we also continue to anticipate paying a $25 million earnout in 2026 following the anticipated mid-2026 AMDS PMA approval. With that, I will turn the call back to Pat for his closing comments.
Pat Mackin: Thanks, Lance. Overall, we have near-term work to do, and we exited Q1 with greater conviction in our foundational growth strategy. We are excited to move forward with our pending acquisition of Endospan, as the NEXUS platform stands to complete our market-leading aortic arch portfolio. We see PMA approval of AMDS on track for midyear. Implant adoption for AMDS continues to build, and our broader market expansion pipeline is accelerating as planned, particularly with ARTISON enrolling as expected. Our long-range growth thesis remains intact.
More specifically, we expect future growth to be driven by four key growth drivers: number one, the AMDS PMA; we are commercializing AMDS in the U.S. under HDE, increasing penetration of the annual U.S. market opportunity, with new clinical data, reimbursement dynamics, and PMA approval likely to be further tailwinds. Number two, the On-X heart valve data; we are continuing to educate providers on clinical data showing mortality and reoperation benefits in patients under 65 compared to bioprosthetic valves, which we expect to translate into greater market share globally. Number three, NEXUS; we are moving forward with our strategy to acquire our partner Endospan following the FDA approval of NEXUS.
This acquisition, if closed, will provide an additional near-term growth driver, position us at the forefront of this segment, and significantly expand our pipeline with three additional PMA programs in development, extending our runway well beyond the initial approval. Number four, the ARTISON IDE trial; we continue to make progress in our third-generation frozen elephant trunk program, our C-Branch LSA. This clinical trial represents an incremental $80 million U.S. annual opportunity. I want to thank our employees around the globe for their continued dedication to our mission of being a leading partner to surgeons focused on aortic disease. We will now open the call for questions.
Operator: At this time, we will be conducting a question-and-answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press 1 on your telephone keypad. You may press 2 if you would like to remove your question from the queue. One moment, please, while we poll for questions. Our first question comes from Stifel. Your line is now live.
Analyst: Hi, Pat and Lance. Thanks for taking the question. I just want to understand better on this guidance reset what is exactly contemplated in it now, because I think there are a few key assumptions, and the key one is exactly when AMDS receives PMA and then more broadly what kind of opportunity the PMA unlocks. Is this truly conservative, adequate, or how would you frame it in terms of expectations for when you get this AMDS approval, and then how should we think about the opportunity that approval unlocks in the context of the revenue ramp throughout the year?
Pat Mackin: Thanks. I would say a couple of things. There were two things that did not go as planned in the first quarter. Number one was international stents were off, mostly due to unplanned things: one was the Middle East, and two was some supply chain challenges. Those are temporary, and we are working to fix those. Second, as we pointed out, was the AMDS starter set sales. Those are the starter sets where the hospital has to buy four. We do think that the PMA will help.
We have been saying all along that we did not think the PMA was going to make that much of a difference, but the closer we get to PMA approval, there is some bureaucracy and work that hospitals have to do to get IRBs in place, and with the PMA so close, many are just going to wait. So we do think that will be helpful. We are also working to knock down some of the barriers that we are seeing on getting these starter sets. The encouraging thing is that we were ahead of plan on the actual implants.
That is what we are working on now—making sure we can get access to these starter sets and working through that process.
Lance Berry: We have been saying we expect PMA approval midyear. We still expect that. As far as what the guidance contemplates, it basically contemplates the trends we are seeing right now. We are working to improve those, but that is probably going to take a little bit of time. We think this is prudent guidance given the trends we have right now.
Analyst: Got it. That is helpful. And then I also wanted to hit on NEXUS. You talked about working towards closing the acquisition. What are you doing as you work up to 01/01/2027 in terms of building out the commercial infrastructure from here, whether it be hiring or whatever else is required? Key next steps as you build to NEXUS would be great.
Pat Mackin: We are very excited about this NEXUS platform. It is the third piece of the puzzle—AMDS, our LSA branch solution, and NEXUS—and that really gives us a comprehensive portfolio for the arch. We will need to do a few things to get ready. Number one, we must go through the value analysis committees. As you have experienced with AMDS, it can take four to six months. We will use that time to do two things: build inventory and hire dedicated clinical specialists. The good news is this is a very different market than AMDS in that there are only about 100 accounts on our initial list. These are very high-end, high-volume accounts.
We know who they are, and we can cover that call point with not a lot of reps. We have already started hiring and will continue to add as we go through the value analysis process. Those are the two main focuses once we close this transaction to be ready for a January 1 launch.
Analyst: Thanks. That is helpful, and thanks for taking the questions.
Pat Mackin: Yep.
Operator: Our next question comes from Lake Street Capital. Your line is now live.
Frank Takkinen: Great. Thank you for taking the questions. I was hoping to get a little more color on reordering versus a potential plateauing of new accounts. Are new accounts starting to slow down or is the reordering not yet occurring? It feels like we had a steep trajectory with some of the initial ordering patterns, and then we are just waiting for the reordering, or are new orders starting to plateau?
Pat Mackin: Let me clarify. We have started using the term “starter sets,” which is basically an account that does not have AMDS. To get AMDS, they need to purchase four devices for $100 thousand. That is not a normal practice for a lot of businesses that will consign units or sell out of trunk stock. We are having hospitals acquire four units. The other piece is the actual implants of the existing accounts. Those went quite well and were ahead of our plan. We are very encouraged and pleased by adoption in the accounts that purchased.
What we are working on now is a lot of accounts that have AMDS in the queue, and we are working to get the units on the shelf. Barriers include the IRB or the $100 thousand upfront purchase. We are working on programs to minimize that burden.
Lance Berry: In summary, there is the upfront $100 thousand, and every time the device gets used, they need to reorder a device. We call that initial $100 thousand a set sale, and everything after that is implant sales. Implant sales went great. They were ahead of our expectation, and all the feedback we are getting on those is fantastic. We are running into barriers getting the upfront $100 thousand investment approved for a number of different reasons—IRB, financial considerations—so we are putting things in place to help overcome those barriers. We think we will see a reacceleration of starter set sales.
Pat Mackin: Because the $100 thousand upfront lands on someone’s desk, it can get stuck there for a while. A key point is DRG 209 for complex arch work—there is very strong reimbursement for AMDS. It takes time for that information to be disseminated to the account, so we are working to ensure they have good visibility to the publicly available information on DRG 209 and what that means to their procedural billing.
Frank Takkinen: Got it. Very helpful. Thank you. And then as a second one on NEXUS, how should we think about the growth trajectory? There is potentially more training upfront, but it is very novel, so I would expect a strong growth trajectory coming out of that. And is there a point in time that the $8 million incremental cost is offset by revenue as you think about the ramp?
Pat Mackin: Surgeons, particularly vascular surgeons, have a lot of patients who are not being treated right now because there is no option. These are patients too sick for cardiac surgery, and we now have a solution in the arch to treat those patients. They adopt technology rapidly because of the unmet need. The building blocks are: get through value analysis committees, train the surgeons, hire the team, and build inventory. Our goal is to be ready by January 1. We believe this technology has real opportunity to drive growth for the company and help a lot of patients. We will give you more information as we go into 2027.
Lance Berry: On the $8 million, it is broken into three pieces. One is initial launch preparation costs that will not carry forward into next year. There are R&D and clinical related expenses that are incremental this year, but as we roll into 2027, we will fit those into our normal 7% to 8% of sales; it is not really incremental from a 2027 standpoint. Then there are run-rate expenses for the sales force and some G&A that will carry forward, and we think those will be covered by actual NEXUS revenue in the U.S. in 2027, making it EBITDA neutral overall. On supply chain and logistics, NEXUS is very different than AMDS. We are not making people buy it upfront.
AMDS cases are acute type A emergencies, so you have to have stock on the shelf. Chronic dissections are elective, so we have time beforehand to know exactly what devices are needed, and we will ship them into the cases and get paid at the case. There will be no shelf stocking limiter for NEXUS.
Frank Takkinen: Got it. Very helpful. Thank you, guys.
Lance Berry: Thanks, Ryan.
Operator: Our next question is from Canaccord Genuity. Your line is now live.
William Plovanic: Hey, thanks. Good evening. I just wanted to unpack AMDS a little more. One of the challenges brought up multiple times is starter sets. You mentioned strategies to get around this. Are you going to shift the product to consignment, or do you believe the PMA is really going to open that? Is there a backlog? Are we through the early adopter phase and now getting into a broader customer base, implying a slower ramp for new accounts? Lastly, what was the growth of the core stent business if you back out AMDS?
Pat Mackin: We have plenty of hospitals. When we set our internal plan and expectations for the year, we had more than enough target accounts to hit the numbers we communicated. We were pleased with implants—ongoing implants were ahead of what we expected. The challenge is getting into hospitals with this upfront $100 thousand purchase. We are not going to consignment. That could always be a last resort, but that is not our strategy. We have programs to address barriers to the $100 thousand upfront. Once PMA is out, there is no longer an IRB, and we think that will be very helpful. Getting accounts through those processes is what we are working on.
That timing is harder to control than implant timing.
Lance Berry: We do not break out the details on U.S. AMDS revenue compared to international stent grafts. You can tell by geographic growth rates: international growth was much lower than we typically expect this quarter for the reasons discussed. If you normalize North America for easier comps in Q4 and Q1, the North America growth rate is pretty similar in Q4 to Q1, which points to the slowdown being driven significantly by international. But U.S. AMDS starter set sales were below our expectations for the quarter.
William Plovanic: When you started out the launch in the first quarter last year, you talked about 140 targeted accounts, with 600 full potential. Can you give any sense of the total targeted number of accounts today and how far you have penetrated?
Lance Berry: We have not broken that out. I would say at this point we still have plenty of opportunity to sell starter sets. As we move along, we will consider giving more detail because at some point the starter set is a one-time revenue event, and the implants matter most long term. We will consider providing more information later, but we are not breaking that out at the moment.
William Plovanic: On NEXUS, you are pushing to a 2027 launch. Is manufacturing scaled and ready to go?
Lance Berry: They are manufacturing today. We have been selling the product in Europe for over five years. We do need to expand and build inventory for the U.S. launch. Endospan had an agreement with us to be acquired upon PMA approval and had no intention of commercializing the U.S. product themselves, so they did not build inventory for a U.S. launch. There is some scale up, but mainly we just need to build product.
William Plovanic: Thanks for taking my questions.
Pat Mackin: Thanks, Bill.
Operator: Our next question is from Oppenheimer. Your line is now live.
Analyst: Hi, Pat. Hi, Lance. Thank you for taking our questions. On AMDS, can you quantify how many accounts are deferring AMDS for PMA approval? Is this the first time you are calling it out, or has this been an ongoing trend that is now coming to a head? And with that, should we expect a bolus once you get PMA approval?
Pat Mackin: We have been saying for several quarters that we did not really see PMA as a big catalyst. What has happened is practical: for example, we have to go to an IRB at a hospital and the surgeon has to take four hours of training. If PMA is expected in the second quarter, the surgeon may say, “I will just wait. I am not going to do four hours of training for this IRB.” We do have a number of accounts impacted by this. We are not giving specifics on counts. As PMA gets closer, people are less inclined to do the IRB work, and we see PMA as an opportunity. That is contemplated in our guidance.
Analyst: On cross-selling with On-X via AMDS, any differences you are seeing in physician utilization? Are they ramping up on a similar curve, or is it more additive but minimal?
Pat Mackin: It speaks to our strategy. We are a valve company that treats patients under 65 with the Ross and with On-X, and we are an aortic arch company. Our interactions with top aortic surgeons span our trials—PERSEVERE, ARTISON, TRIUMPH. We are training AMDS centers, and we will have NEXUS trainings that bring heart and vascular surgeons together. We have ARTISON investigator meetings. All of those events help us build relationships with aortic surgeons and deliver our messages across On-X, AMDS, and NEXUS. It is all about the aorta and is highly complementary. We are already seeing cross-selling, and it will get better as we scale trainings.
Operator: Our next question comes from Ladenburg Thalmann. Your line is now live.
Jeffrey Cohen: Hi, Pat and Lance. Thanks for taking the questions. Two from us. Any updates as far as the commercial organization, both U.S., EU, and perhaps Japan—W-2s and 1099s—for the balance of this year that we should anticipate?
Lance Berry: We will have to hire some specialists for NEXUS, but other than that, sales force additions would be fairly limited across the globe and still highly leverageable with our focused sales force.
Pat Mackin: On NEXUS, our initial target is about 100 U.S. accounts. We can cover that with a small, dedicated team because these are elective cases. In Japan, we have a relationship with a distributor that has a dedicated team on the ground. We have the commercial infrastructure in Japan; we just need to work through the approval process.
Jeffrey Cohen: As a follow-up, can we touch upon the tissue business? It was a strong quarter. Any puts and takes or trends for the balance of the year?
Lance Berry: We have told people to think about that as a $24 million per quarter business. We did a little better this quarter, which is great, but that is within normal quarterly fluctuations. If it is a little less in a future quarter, do not read into it. As long as it averages to about $24 million for the year, that is in line with expectations.
Jeffrey Cohen: Got it. Thanks for taking the questions.
Operator: Our next question comes from Needham & Company. Your line is live.
Michael Matson: Thanks for taking my question. Starting with AMDS, I understand the commentary around consignment and the $100 thousand sets, but why not put it on consignment? Is it tying up too much of your capital and inventory on hospital shelves, or is there another reason you are requiring hospitals to have this big expense to get started?
Lance Berry: You can always flip to consignment; you can never flip back. It is an emergency case; they need it on the shelf. It is a differentiated product with incredible reimbursement, and we think it is something they should stock. Many accounts have made the purchase. We have hit a point where, further down the list, we are seeing resistance that we had not seen earlier. Our job is to overcome that barrier. We have multiple levers to pull and will come up with solutions as we move along. We are not going to throw in the towel at the first sign of resistance.
Pat Mackin: The data are extremely compelling. AMDS can convert malperfusion to non-malperfusion with associated mortality and blood flow restoration benefits. It eliminates the need for vein grafts, with about a 30% difference in reoperation at 10 years and a 20% difference in mortality at five years. It is an emergency, there has not been innovation in 50 years, and it has the best DRG in the market. It should be stocked. Once you start consignment, you typically do not reverse it.
Michael Matson: On international stent graft issues, you called out the Middle East and supply chain. Which was bigger?
Pat Mackin: About half and half. We have significant business in the Middle East, and we did not contemplate the current situation impacting results, but it did. We also had supply chain items we were not anticipating.
Michael Matson: On the revenue guidance of 7% to 11% constant currency, what are your assumptions for AMDS sets and international stent graft sales? Any improvement assumed?
Lance Berry: There is definitely some improvement expected for AMDS starter set sales, but at a rate lower than originally anticipated. Roughly half of the guidance reduction is AMDS starter sets and half is international stent grafts. The international stent graft impact is split roughly evenly between the Middle East situation and supply chain issues we are working through.
Michael Matson: Got it. Thank you.
Operator: Our next question comes from Citizens. Your line is now live.
Daniel Walker Stauder: Thanks for taking the questions. First on AMDS reordering behavior, usage was more than you expected. Are multiple surgeons utilizing at some of your larger accounts? Any additional color?
Pat Mackin: Typically, a surgeon from an account goes to the training program, returns, and starts implanting, then trains partners or they attend training. In bigger centers, there are often two, three, or four surgeons handling acute type A dissections. We might train one at a hospital, but there are multiple on call. We are training more surgeons per account over time. As usage spreads within accounts, reorders increase. We were pleased that reorders were ahead of expectations.
Daniel Walker Stauder: Any different margin contribution from reorders compared to initial orders? Gross margins were strong despite starter set softness.
Lance Berry: There is no meaningful difference to gross margin. Both are strong.
Daniel Walker Stauder: Thank you.
Operator: Our next question comes from Freedom Capital Markets. Your line is now live.
Analyst: Thank you. On-X, can you talk about current usage split between younger and older patients before the new data and where it is today?
Pat Mackin: We do not get real-time patient-level age data, but we have historical profiles. Based on recent conferences, there is a lot of discussion about papers showing a mortality benefit for mechanical valves in patients under 60 and about a 20% reoperation benefit at 10 years in mechanical versus tissue valves for patients under 65. We are getting that data out and are growing share in the bioprosthetic space where we previously had not. Much of our growth is from patients aged roughly 50 to 65, which is our focus segment.
Analyst: On NEXUS go-forward plans, are there plans to bring Duo and Tre to the U.S., and what regulatory steps are required? Any logistical issues having a custom-made product coming from Israel into the U.S.?
Pat Mackin: It is still early; we do not own the company yet, but we have strong collaboration. We are planning to bring Duo and Tre to the U.S. It will require a clinical trial. We will have an off-the-shelf version rather than a custom-made version, which is part of the innovation. We are working on timing and will update our pipeline after closing and integration. On logistics, for U.S. commercialization we will align supply to elective case scheduling, so we do not anticipate custom-made logistical constraints for the U.S. launch plan.
Operator: We have an additional question from Canaccord Genuity. Your line is now live.
William Plovanic: There has been some discussion on supply chain challenges, and it sounds like that will continue to impact going forward. Can you unpack what it is, the solution, and timing? How much of the portfolio does it impact?
Lance Berry: We are not going into a lot of detail, but we have ring-fenced the issue. It relates to our supplier network. We have our arms around it and feel confident about solving it, but it will take a little time. The time to solve it is contemplated in our guidance. It is not broadly across the stent graft portfolio—specific to a small number of products.
William Plovanic: Okay. Great. Thanks.
Operator: We have reached the end of the question-and-answer session. I would now like to turn the call back over to management for closing comments.
Pat Mackin: Thank you for joining the call. We are excited about the Endospan transaction and will be working to close that. This is an exciting day for the company as it is the final piece to the puzzle of our aortic arch solutions. We have AMDS approved under HDE in the U.S. now and are hoping to get PMA midyear. NEXUS just received approval, and you heard our launch plans. ARTISON is enrolling as expected. We have three PMAs in the arch—one approved, one about to be approved, and one on its way. It is very exciting for the company, and we appreciate your support as we continue to build this aortic company. Thank you.
Operator: This concludes today’s call. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation, and have a wonderful evening.
Should you buy stock in Artivion right now?
Before you buy stock in Artivion, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Artivion wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $476,034!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,274,109!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 974% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 206% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of May 7, 2026.
This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.
The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Artivion (AORT) Q1 2026 Earnings Transcript was originally published by The Motley Fool
View Comments
